APOSTLES

 

“Peter, Andrew, James and John, - fishermen of Capernaum

Thomas and St. Matthew too, Philip and Bartholomew,

James the less and Jude the brave,

Simon the zealot and Judas the knave...” (i.e. Judas Iscariot)

-Matthias took the place of Judas, who hanged himself.

-Paul was the special apostle to the Gentiles. (Gal. 2:8, 9; Ro. 11. 13)

 

I.    THE TWELVE

 

Matthew 10:1 And when he had called unto him his twelve disciples, he gave them power against unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal all manner of sickness and all manner of disease. 2 Now the names of the twelve apostles are these; The first, Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother; James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother; 3 Philip, and Bartholomew; Thomas, and Matthew the publican; James the son of Alphaeus, and Lebbaeus, whose surname was Thaddaeus; 4 Simon the Canaanite, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him. 5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:

 

Acts 1: 13 And when they were come in, they went up into an upper room, where abode both Peter, and James, and John, and Andrew, Philip, and Thomas, Bartholomew, and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon Zelotes, and Judas the brother of James.

 

Comparison between these two accounts indicates that Thaddaeus (Lebbaeus) was also known as “Judas the brother of James

 

II.      APOSTLESHIP OF MATTHIAS

 

A.        Luke includes Matthias as being one of the Twelve Apostles.

1.   Ac. 1:17-26  Luke says he was “numbered with the eleven.”  Many years after his selection, Luke presents it as an action take to comply with divine instructions, being determined by God in response to their prayers. No hint of doubt is indicated.  Even the words, “numbered with” are the same used concerning Judas's original selection to fill the office. (v. 17, 20)

2.   Ac. 2:1-4  Matthias was included with the eleven in “receiving power after the Holy Spirit came” in order to become a “witness of the resurrection.”  (1:8, 2-5)

3.   Ac. 2:14  Peter stood up “With the eleven  This included Matthias. In verses 37, 42, these are called “Apostles

4.   Ac. 6:2, 6  (cf. “we” in v. 3, 4) Matthias is included in the action of “the twelve” and included among “the apostles  (Note: Paul was not converted until chapter 9)

 

B.  Paul was never included among “The Twelve.”

Thus, passages such as Rev. 21:14 would not have reference to him.  These do not limit the number of apostles but only a specific group spoken of as “the twelve  Paul was not among those to whom Jesus said, “YE shall sit on twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes...” (Mt. 19:28)  Paul was commissioned to the Gentiles. (Ro. 11:13; Gal. 2:7-9)

 

  1. Paul made no claim to be included as one of “The Twelve 

He says in 1Co. 15:5-9 that Jesus appeared “unto the Twelve” before he appeared unto Paul.  Since Judas had then been hanged (Mt. 27:3-5; 28:16), and Paul was not yet converted, it is obvious that the twelfth was Matthias.

 

  1. No hint of doubt concerning Matthias's apostleship among the twelve is ever indicated. 

The misconception that there could be no other Apostles just because the Apostles to the Jews were limited to twelve is shown to be in error by the fact that even others besides Paul were called “Apostles.”  Barnabas was classed as an apostle along with Paul. (Ac. 14:4, 14) cf. 1Co. 9:1-6, 11, 12; Gal. 2:8, 9).  James the Lord's brother is also called an Apostle.  (Gal. 1:19;  cf. 1Co. 15:7; Gal. 2:7-9). (Cf. Gal. 1:18, 19 with Ac. 9:27, 28).

 

            The force of this is especially strong in view of the fact that in exposing false Apostles, no one ever argued that only the twelve could be Apostles.  If this were true it would be one of the first and most effective points in exposing false Apostles.  Rather, the first qualification they required was evidence that the person had seen Jesus after his resurrection (1Co. 9:1; Ac. 1:22; 4:33).  The second was whether he could do the “signs of an Apostle” (Rev. 2:2; 2Co. 12:12; Ac. 8:17, 18; 19:6; Rom. 1:11; 1Tim. 1:6).                

 

III.             APOSTLESHIP OF PAUL

 

Paul was not one of the twelve who were to sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel  (see II-B and C above)

 

Paul had seen the Lord after the resurrection, required to be an apostle (Acts 1:22)

Acts 9:3-6; 22:6-8; 26:15-16; 1Cor 9:1; 15:8

 

Paul had done “the signs of an apostle

2Cor 12:12

 

Paul was called an “apostle” by Luke

 

Acts 14:14 But when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of it, they rent their garments, and sprang forth among the multitude, crying out

 

Paul was an apostle to the Gentiles

 

Rom 11:13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:

 

2Tim 1: 11 Whereunto I am appointed a preacher, and an apostle, and a teacher of the Gentiles.

 

Gal 2:7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; 8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) 9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.

 

Paul’s apostleship was no less than that of the twelve

 

Galatians 2:6 But from those who were reputed to be somewhat (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth not man's person)-- they, I say, who were of repute imparted nothing to me:

 

1 Corinthians 9:1 Am I not an apostle? am I not free? have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? are not ye my work in the Lord? 2 If I be not an apostle unto others, yet doubtless I am to you: for the seal of mine apostleship are ye in the Lord. 3 Mine answer to them that do examine me is this, 4 Have we not power to eat and to drink? 5 Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the brethren of the Lord, and Cephas?

 

2 Corinthians 11:5 For I reckon that I am not a whit behind the very chiefest apostles.

 

2 Corinthians 12:11 I am become foolish: ye compelled me; for I ought to have been commended of you: for in nothing was I behind the very chiefest apostles, though I am nothing. 12 Truly the signs of an apostle were wrought among you in all patience, by signs and wonders and mighty works.

 

IV.       OTHER APOSTLES

 

A.     Barnabus

 

Acts 14:3 Long time therefore abode they speaking boldly in the Lord, which gave testimony unto the word of his grace, and granted signs and wonders to be done by their hands. 4 But the multitude of the city was divided: and part held with the Jews, and part with the apostles.

 

Acts 14:14 But when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of it, they rent their garments, and sprang forth among the multitude, crying out

 

      This suggests that Barnabas was an “apostle” in the same sense as Paul.

 

      No mention is made of Barnabus having seen Jesus after the resurrection but he very well may have. (1Cor 15:6)

 

B.     James, the Lord’s brother

 

Acts 9:27 Barnabas took Paul to see the “apostles.” In Gal. 1:19 Paul tells us that these were Peter, and “James, the Lord’s brother 

 

It seems he was not one of the original “twelve” since John 7:5, after the twelve had been  chosen, says his brothers did not believe in him.  So, the question is, when did James become an apostle?  He does not appear to be a replacement for James the brother of John since that “James” was not killed until Acts 12:2 after James the Lord’s brother was an apostle, yet he seems to be an apostle in the same sense as Peter (Acts 9:27). 

Some think this is James the Less, a relative of Jesus (Mat 27:56). According to this view, “the Lord’s brother” is not speaking of Jesus’ brother, as identified in Matt. 13:55 and Mark 15:40.  James the Less is identified as James the son of Zebedee (Mat 4:21)

 

We do know that he had seen the Lord after the resurrection (1Cor 15:7) and that statement, contrasted with “then to all the apostles” suggests that he was an apostle.

 

C.     Silvanus (Silas) and Timothy

By connecting 1Thes 1:1 with 2:6 some have thought that Paul calls Silas and Timothy apostles.  Evidence is lacking that they actually held the office of an apostle of Christ.  “Apostle” merely means a person is “sent with a message.”

We have no evidence that Jesus ever appeared to Timothy or Silas.  Timothy was converted years later.

 

D.  Epaphroditus

 

Philip 2:25 speaks of Epaphroditus as “your messenger” (apostolos).  Again, evidence is lacking that he was an “apostle of Christ” in an official sense.

 

D.     Andronicus and Junias

 

Rom 16:7 says that Andronicus and Junias were “of note among the apostles  This cannot be shown to mean they were apostles.